William and Mary
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
412  David Barney JR 32:45
431  Trevor Sleight SR 32:49
464  Faris Sakallah SR 32:51
525  Ryan McGorty SO 32:57
702  JP Trojan FR 33:18
712  Dawson Connell JR 33:19
829  Christopher Hoyle JR 33:30
944  Cavender Salvadori JR 33:39
1,016  Cooper Leslie FR 33:45
1,142  Ryan Thompson JR 33:56
1,443  Tyler Cox-Philyaw FR 34:20
1,647  Andrew Cacciatore FR 34:37
1,673  AJ Tucker SR 34:40
2,087  Thomas Vinci SO 35:19
National Rank #78 of 312
Southeast Region Rank #11 of 48
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 8th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 2.9%
Top 10 in Regional 90.1%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating David Barney Trevor Sleight Faris Sakallah Ryan McGorty JP Trojan Dawson Connell Christopher Hoyle Cavender Salvadori Cooper Leslie Ryan Thompson Tyler Cox-Philyaw
Panorama Farms Invitational 09/23 879 31:53 32:38 32:43 33:01 33:17 33:59 33:19 33:02 34:09 34:24 33:39
Penn State National Open 10/14 1014 33:48 33:02 33:01 32:46 33:10 32:51 33:24 34:07 33:39 35:16
The CNU Invitational 10/15 1245 34:01
Colonial Athletic Conference 10/29 1018 32:49 32:59 32:56 33:11 33:43 32:54 33:21 33:19 33:38 33:58 34:17
Southeast Region Championships 11/11 947 32:41 32:32 33:03 32:29 33:09 33:58 34:01





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 8.2 270 0.1 0.5 2.4 8.3 24.7 30.7 14.9 8.7 5.9 3.0 0.7 0.5 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
David Barney 41.7 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 0.6 0.8 1.2 1.4 2.0 2.6
Trevor Sleight 45.6 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 1.0 1.0 1.4
Faris Sakallah 49.6 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.3 0.8 0.9
Ryan McGorty 54.9 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4
JP Trojan 75.5
Dawson Connell 76.8
Christopher Hoyle 87.5




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 0.1% 0.1 3
4 0.5% 0.5 4
5 2.4% 2.4 5
6 8.3% 8.3 6
7 24.7% 24.7 7
8 30.7% 30.7 8
9 14.9% 14.9 9
10 8.7% 8.7 10
11 5.9% 5.9 11
12 3.0% 3.0 12
13 0.7% 0.7 13
14 0.5% 0.5 14
15 0.1% 0.1 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0